AI Live Chat for Real Estate Websites: Who Answers at 9pm About a Viewing

Estate agency is a 24 hour sales floor that most agencies run for nine. Rightmove data and industry reports keep pointing in the same direction: serious buyer enquiries happen outside office hours, often twice as many in the evening as during the working day. The buyer who asks "is the 9pm viewing still available" and gets nothing is the buyer who books with the next agent.

This article goes through the published prices of the main live chat and AI chat tools used by UK and US estate agents, shows the five different pricing meters, and does the arithmetic on what one missed viewing request costs against a month of subscriptions.

Why estate agency is a different chat market

Most chat software was built for ecommerce, where the customer is at a screen buying something. Estate agency is different in three ways that change which tool you should pick.

First, the question is rarely the listing. The listing is on Rightmove, Zoopla or Zillow, and the buyer has already read it. The question is about availability, the viewing, the area, the offer process, and whether the seller will take a number below the asking price. Those answers come from your diary and your local knowledge, not from your website copy.

Second, the enquiries are spiky and after hours. A new listing drops on a Thursday afternoon. The phone and chat light up that evening, all weekend, and on Monday morning. The agent who answers at 9pm books the Saturday viewing. The agent who answers on Monday books nothing.

Third, the value of one answered enquiry is large. A booked viewing is the start of a transaction worth thousands in commission. Most agents know what a converted instruction is worth. If you do not, the maths at the bottom of this article will walk you through it.

The five pricing meters

Live chat and AI chat tools charge in five different ways. Comparing them on price without knowing the meter is the most common mistake. The meter changes everything: a free plan that charges per conversation gets expensive on day one, a per-agent plan punishes part time staff, and a per-resolved-outcome model looks cheap until you have a busy month.

The Asyntai row is ours. Read it as a disclosure.

Look at the "what goes wrong" column. Every meter has a failure mode. The job is to pick the meter whose failure mode you can absorb, not the one with the lowest headline number.

The published prices, side by side

All prices below are first party, taken from each vendor's pricing page in September 2026. Conversions are USD unless stated.

The Asyntai row is ours. Read it as a disclosure.

Two things to notice. First, the meters do not line up. A $0 Tidio plan and a $0 tawk.to plan look the same until a buyer opens a chat. Second, "from" pricing is for small accounts, not for the agency that has three branches, one Saturday rota, and 40 buyer enquiries a week.

What one missed enquiry is worth

This is the bit that matters. Pick a number you believe for your own agency, then do the arithmetic.

The numbers are rough, but they are conservative. Most branch managers will tell you one good instruction pays for a year of software, a year of advertising, and most of the rent. If you do a higher share, a higher fee, or sell in a hotter market, the number is bigger.

Now compare that to the software. LiveChat Team annual is $49 per agent per month. Five agents covering evenings and weekends is $245 a month, $2,940 a year. Olark AI Website Agent annual is $4,800 a year plus seats. Intercom Advanced is $85 per seat, which is $425 a month for five seats.

The price of the tool is rarely the problem. The price of missing one viewing is the problem.

After hours coverage, by tool

After hours is the whole game for estate agency. Here is what each tool actually does when your office is closed.

The Asyntai row is ours. Read it as a disclosure.

Two patterns. Tools built around human agents assume a human is at the desk. Tools with an AI layer (Tidio, Olark, Intercom, Asyntai) can answer after hours, but charge differently for it: Tidio by conversation, Olark and Intercom by a separate product, Asyntai by message.

The five things that should decide the purchase

After the meter and the after hours behaviour, these are the questions that split the shortlist.

1. Single sign on for your team. Estate agencies run on Google Workspace or Microsoft 365. If the chat tool supports OIDC SSO including Entra and Google, your negotiators log in once and you can revoke access the day they leave.
2. Per website scoping. If you run a branch website, a lettings site, and a new homes site, you want permissions and transcripts kept apart. A tool that puts everything in one shared inbox will leak a buyer's offer to the wrong branch.
3. Audit log. Compliance and complaints both need it. An append-only log that cannot be edited or deleted is what regulators and your PI insurer expect.
4. PII redaction. Buyer names, seller names, and offer amounts flow through chat. A configurable redaction layer with a separate output classifier, rather than a prompt instruction, is what holds up under pressure.
5. Retention and deletion. Configure chat retention with auto-delete. Buyer enquiries should not sit on a vendor's server for ever.

Where each tool fits

Use this as a short guide, not a verdict.

LiveChat suits a single branch with two or three negotiators online during office hours. Per agent annual is the cheapest at this size, and the offline form is fine for a branch that answers email the next morning. It does not solve after hours on its own.

Crisp suits a small agency that wants chat, email, and a basic chatbot in one shared inbox. The free 2 seat plan is genuinely useful for a sole agent testing the idea. Per workspace pricing rewards you for getting bigger, then punishes you when you need one more seat than the plan includes.

Tidio suits an agency with a web shop or lots of repeat site visits, less so a listing-driven estate agency. Per conversation billing is hard to forecast when a new listing goes live and 300 buyers open a chat the same weekend.

Olark suits agencies that want a live chat layer for office hours and a separate AI agent for FAQs. The two are priced separately and the AI Website Agent annual is $4,800, which is a real line item.

tawk.to suits agencies with zero budget and a tolerance for a "tawk.to" badge on every property page. It is genuinely free, and the $19 a month branding removal is the cheapest line item in the table.

Intercom suits agencies that want chat, ticket queue, and a knowledge base in one place, and are happy paying $85 to $132 per seat. Fin AI at $0.99 per resolved outcome is reasonable for an agency that can measure it; it is hard to forecast on a busy weekend.

Asyntai suits an agency whose main problem is unanswered after hours enquiries. Per message billing maps cleanly to "answered enquiries"; the transcript sits in your audit log; access is scoped per website. Enterprise is a signed order form with a negotiated allowance.

The arithmetic one more time

Put the numbers together and the choice gets easier.

That is the trade. The cheap tool that misses a £400 net instruction is not cheap. The more expensive tool that catches one extra viewing a month pays for itself many times over.

How to choose, in five steps

1. Write down how many buyer enquiries you got last weekend after 6pm. That is the number your chat tool needs to handle.
2. Decide which meter you can absorb: agent, seat, conversation, branding, resolved outcome, or message.
3. Shortlist the tools that match the meter and answer after hours.
4. Check the four non-price items: SSO, per website scoping, audit log, PII redaction.
5. Price the shortlist at your real headcount or volume, not the "from" number on the pricing page.

Sources